
©Federica Belli
Becoming One
In dialogue with Federica Belli
FVTVRIST Magazine // 19 March 2025
Interview by Elina P.
We are at Federica’s home studio overlooking Paris’s 7th arrondissement. The dialogue begins with her most recent series: self-portraits marked by a complete absence of self. A continuation of her cameraless practice, these photograms return to the essential components of the photographic medium ~ light, subject matter, and photosensitive paper or metal ~ where a bond forms between her own bodily fluids, organic elements and the photosensitive surface.
Strong presence that is born in a complete coalescence and dissolution.


A Night in my Arms, 2024; Midnight Tears, 2025, Photogram on photosensitive color paper Fujiflex ©Federica Belli
Federica:
Photography is a lot more than just creating images: it’s the only medium that records a visual trace of life directly. Painting comes to life mostly from the imagination of the painter and the materiality of the paint, while sculpture records a three-dimensional trace of presence. Photography, in a way, is a painting made by adjusting and arranging reality.
The deep respect I carry for photography has nothing to do with its use for capturing an image which is already visible through my eyes, but rather about revealing something present but hidden to the eye, something that resists naming. One might identify it with the “sublime”, but it is a wider layer of existence, one without definition. It escapes the contemporary scientific impulse to name everything.
There is no name for the hyperreal feeling right after leaving someone you love; no name for the feeling of someone dear to you dying.
It’s not just sadness, it’s the realization that life has an end, and violent delights often have violent ends.

Sunrise Tears, a Negative, 2025. Photogram on photosensitive color paper
Fujiflex ©Federica Belli
Is it… confusion?
Exactly. There is grief, often overlapping with confusing, and an uncontainable joy of being alive, which is also confusing. That is what I try to get a trace of, in this case on photosensitive paper.
Early on, it would be related to specific events: the first awareness of it came from my great-grandmother’s death. But then I started linking these ways of being to the mere fact of growing up as a woman and seeing your body change, being repulsive to yourself but attractive to others, or the opposite depending on the day.
And over time it came down to time passing, to the acceptance of never being a child again, to the idea of loneliness as a built-in feature of this existence. Over time, adults tend to give in to the resistance to questioning, and simply stop asking uncomfortable questions about the bigger picture; we naturally try to hide whatever feeling makes us feel horrendous unworthy creatures. In an artist’s work, that is outright impossible.
The work is fundamentally an excuse to keep asking questions and letting feelings freeflow on the one hand, and the by product of those questions on the other.
Do you seek answers or keep the questions open?
At first, as a teenager, I would look for answers. Then I realized that every answer just reduces possibilities. An answer can never be exhaustive or precisely correct, it merely closes the space for more questions.
Take science: the only correct answer so far is that its truths keep changing. And that’s completely ok. No one handed me a contract at birth stating that the world would be perfectly understandable with my senses only, you know?
I am at ease with being an explorer with means not completely apt for her research. I enjoy the quest, and being allowed to ask questions is enough for me.

I also see a lot of presence in your work. You use your body, your fluids. It feels very personal, almost like a diary.
It’s a lot about presence and trace. I’ve always been skeptical of the idea of a purely digital self. Even as a teenager, when my schoolmates would lose their mind over the idea of having a digital avatar, I didn’t really see the point. I understand the fascination with the unknown, but not really the need for that as opposed to a physically boring life.
Sometimes I see a dragonfly and tear up, man. I never had that in the online universe. Feelings come from the body, and while thoughts can be digitized, feelings and sensation simply cannot. We are what we are because of the body, and we also stop being what we are because of its death. It is quite irrational, but the work has always had the role of the only trustworthy trace of me ever being here. It’s the body’s imperfection that allows life, in the end. We tend to avoid its reality, yet it is always there, and the work becomes a way of accepting it, of finding something magical within it. The mere fact that my body can inhale the air between me and you and keep surviving on a planet is sheer magic- on top of being biology. When my grandmother died, I felt sadness, but also a clear awareness that death is part of life, and I even felt guilty for crying: I was not sad because she could not see any more daisies, I was sad because of my impossibility to hang out more with her.
The awareness of such selfishness at the unripe age of thirteen almost destroyed me. But in the end, it just made me more curious about the complex creatures we are. I am realizing I definitely think about humans in a particular way. For instance, I find it difficult to hate people- even those I deeply disagree with- because there is always something in our past that justifies certain behaviors. We are all capable of being awful. So I do feel pity, but I’m somehow ashamed that I would probably not even hate the person who kills me. They must come from a point where it does make sense to kill me, you see what I mean?
More a Cloud than a Woman, 2024.
Pigment print on Hahnemuhle Cotton Paper ©Federica Belli
I also see a lot of presence in your work. You use your body, your fluids. It feels very personal, almost like a diary.
It’s a lot about presence and trace. I’ve always been skeptical of the idea of a purely digital self. Even as a teenager, when my schoolmates would lose their mind over the idea of having a digital avatar, I didn’t really see the point. I understand the fascination with the unknown, but not really the need for that as opposed to a physically boring life.
Sometimes I see a dragonfly and tear up, man. I never had that in the online universe. Feelings come from the body, and while thoughts can be digitized, feelings and sensation simply cannot. We are what we are because of the body, and we also stop being what we are because of its death. It is quite irrational, but the work has always had the role of the only trustworthy trace of me ever being here. It’s the body’s imperfection that allows life, in the end. We tend to avoid its reality, yet it is always there, and the work becomes a way of accepting it, of finding something magical within it. The mere fact that my body can inhale the air between me and you and keep surviving on a planet is sheer magic- on top of being biology. When my grandmother died, I felt sadness, but also a clear awareness that death is part of life, and I even felt guilty for crying: I was not sad because she could not see any more daisies, I was sad because of my impossibility to hang out more with her.
The awareness of such selfishness at the unripe age of thirteen almost destroyed me. But in the end, it just made me more curious about the complex creatures we are. I am realizing I definitely think about humans in a particular way. For instance, I find it difficult to hate people- even those I deeply disagree with- because there is always something in our past that justifies certain behaviors. We are all capable of being awful. So I do feel pity, but I’m somehow ashamed that I would probably not even hate the person who kills me. They must come from a point where it does make sense to kill me, you see what I mean?
And you also work with natural fluids.
Yes. Rain, seawater, moss, dew. I love humidity, I thrive in symbolically foggy situations. The work is a tool for existing in a way that allows me to feel alive, especially in a hideous and imperfect way. On the surface, I might give the impression of a very polished human- and I am, in most ways- but I would never neglect those parts of myself that are socially coded as disregardable.
In the end, our bodies look very polished from the outside, sure- but the insides can be quite groovy and disgusting to an untrained eye. I thrive in those areas. The conversion and distillation of the hideous into something sublime. I grew up in nature, so I miss that organic presence of a natural rhythm given by the ocean, the rain, the wind. Moving to the city at the age of eighteen and never really coming back for good created a need to reconnect to that, which became evident in the bodily nature of the work. Even in the city, it becomes a way to reconnect to an ancestral future.
Are you planning more residencies in nature, like the one you did in Melides, Portugal?
Yes, I’m opening up to residencies as they reach out to me over time. These occasions allow for a full immersion in one’s bubble, which I am not really able to facilitate on my own. I tend to work in waves, with periods of isolation followed by a return to the world.
I am soon going to be hosted for a residency at Villa Gamberaia in Florence, curated by Emmanuela Mazzoni, with another artist whose work I deeply respect. Then in the autumn I am spending a full month by the sea near Marseille, in an experimental architectural structure, building the foundations for what could be my first show in a museum.

Reunion, 2025. Pigment print on Hahnemuhle Cotton Paper ©Federica Belli
Beautiful, congratulations. You have a strong momentum going.
It really feels like a wonderful wave. I oscillate between joy and panic, and I take it all in happily. Creating a body of work that deserves its space is one part of it, but then thriving as an artist does require an amount of work and dedication that I was not really aware of before embarking on this type of life.
With studies in mathematics and economics, I started out with quite different dreams… it just sort of became an evidence at a point, but let’s say I am now fully invested and still learning the codes as I go. And I am still deeply convinced that the quality of the work is simply a result of the quality of the human behind it, which I am building as I go. Even being able to sustain myself in Paris with this work still feels bewildering to me. Paris creates connections.
The real art is the people you meet along the way, and that stick with you for the rest of the way. The work facilitates these encounters, it creates spaces for slower thinking, for more attentive frictions.
You’re very articulate and your titles are poetic. What role does literature play in your work?
It’s central. I never planned to be an artist really, I wanted to be a mathematician and I have always written poetry since I was a child. I was very solitary, and books became my companions. I spent hours reading and discovering other realities, and that shaped my universe. I still write, and currently a book that brings together my texts and images is coming to life. It is layered and still evolving. Just like the person behind it, once again. I definitely still see myself more like a thinker than as an artist, but I am also realizing the two coincide more and more.
All my work comes from literature. Later, in university, I became interested in quantum physics: it gave an articulate language and idea to the sensation I had about reality and our place in it. The titles come from an intersection of all these spaces. I want them to mirror and suggest the background of the work to the viewers that are ready to take it in. I ended up focusing on photography because I found it to be the perfect language to translate the foggy theories through a direct experience of the world. Otherwise, I would probably be writing.
Moreover, artists should really accept the hassle of writing and speaking about their work, to form opinions and remain engaged. Having a voice is a form of empowerment to speak about where you stand and what you stand for. Thankfully there are critics and historians to take care of that in cases where the artist didn’t really express her stance in first person, but still… We all know how the writing of history goes.
The more first hand voices we have, the richer the prism of reality. Even that comes down to building your own universe with your hands.
FIN
About Federica Belli
Federica Belli was born in 1998 in Millesimo, Liguria. She lives and works between Paris and Mexico City. Her practice spans a wide range
of media, exploring the materiality of photography as a possible extension of the body in recording traces of the passage of life, engaging with photographic theory and the perspective of hydrofeminism. In her research, she removes the camera and focuses
on the photosensitive paper as a proxy of the human body and sensitivity.
In 2018, while studying Economics and Management at Bocconi University, she began her path in photography, working as an assistant
to Oliviero Toscani at FABRICA and to Chris Buck in New York. Since 2021, the year she was awarded the BNL BNP Paribas Prize, her work has been exhibited at major international photography fairs — including Paris Photo, Photo London, Zona Maco, ArtParis and MIA Photo Fair — as well as at the Digital Art Pavilion of the Venice Biennale and in institutional exhibitions such as Photographers! at the Forte di Belvedere in Florence, curated by Walter Guadagnini.



